Dear Liz, I always enjoy reading a thorough review of a piece as I learn what matters to others. Deliberately trying to write in the style of the bards of yore leaves many opportunities for change. I agree that in line 5 "fire" deserves a bit too much beat. I'll let it ride for now hoping someone will come up with a substitute, even possibly me. In line 17 I think the "such" also merits a little too much beat but I'm trying to emphasize the google eyes on the part of the "hosts" and like the "s" sounds. Line 19 I want to retain the trimeter. I do like the ending. I suppose, if they appear as we envision them, we'd look just as comical to them. As to the third stanza, I must be a bit coy to be vague while not being obviously so. I'll here admit that I'm satisfied that there's life more intelligent than we in the universe, but I've never seen an indication in the flesh. Thanks for your comments! Cheers, Ron jgd
Dear Nina, If man is an animal as all our senses tell us, we seem to be just as feral as all other meat-eaters. There are few species of totally docile critters in the world (eg. sheep) and they are dependent on other forms to protect them. Even the non-living world is violent with earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, etc. If space travellers are on their way here right now, how would we receive them? Cheers, Ron
·······  ·······
|