|
What price Diamonds?, Wizard Award Winner |
|
|
Guest_Jox_*
|
Jun 20 05, 03:55
|
Guest

|
© Todd Congreve, 2005. I, Todd Congreve, do assert my right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with Sections 77 and 78 of The Copyrights, Designs And Patents Act, 1988. (Laws of Cymru & England, as recognised by international treaties). This work was simultaneously copyrighted in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America. This work is posted as an unpublished work in order to elicit critical assistance and other helpful comment, only.
Thanks to Alan, Nina, Fran and Eisa for your crit and comments.
Updated to: 23/06/2005 @ 1719
Ref: TC 0404 AF (22/06/2005)
 *Graphic provided by Celtic Castle Designs
What price diamonds? [An Economic Paradox*] by TC
Local food store: sparkling water - ninety-nine pence for five litres - in a bottle with carrying handle.
Antwerp jeweller: cut diamond - thousands of pounds for some sparkles - in a pretty box with golden flip-top lid.
Ocean lifeboat: fresh water - everything I own for a few drops - in my begging palms: don’t wrap it.
(end)
===================
Ref: TC 0404 AE
What price diamonds? [An Economic Paradox*] by TC
Local food store - still water: eighty-seven pence for five litres - in a bottle with a carrying handle.
London jeweller - cut diamond: thousands of pounds for a few gems - in a pretty box with golden flip-top lid.
Ocean lifeboat - fresh water: everything I own for anything - in the palms of my hands: don’t wrap it.
(end)
A famous old piece of Economics theory is known as the “Water / Diamonds Paradox.” I hope this poem illustrates it.
For the academic...
Virtually all of Economics is predicated upon The Laws of Supply and Demand. Viz: If price is low then supply is low and demand high and if price is high then supply is high and demand low. Wherever demand and supply meet is known as “Equilibrium.” Diamonds and water seem to be able to undermine this. But of course they don’t. This is because demand depends on various factors - price of the good in question (a), prices of all other goods completing for one’s income (b-z), one’s income (Y) and one’s Preferences (“tastes”) (t).
Thus, the demand equation in Economics is: d=p(a)+p(b-z)+Y+t
So the diamonds / water paradox relates to tastes, rather than just prices.
In a life boat we couldn’t care less about diamonds (unless we’ve already gone balmy) but water is vital if we’re ever to see a diamond again. So our relative taste for water vis-a-vis diamonds is very high. This indicates another aspect in Economics: the less one has of something one wants / needs, then the more one wants it - and the higher price one will bid for it (subject to the demand equation); the more one has of something, the less one is willing to pay for more (again, subject to the demand equation). One thing that makes Economics great fun is that everyone is different - so, unlike the Natural Sciences (Biology, Chemistry and Physics are generally taken to be those these days - plus their off-springs) Social Sciences (Economics, Politics, Ethics) have much more variable data with which to come to terms and construct theories.
Oh? Why a paradox? Simply because usually we’ll usually pay far more for diamonds - Why, when they are far less useful than water, which is, of course, essential? To further understand this concept in Economics we need to investigate Utility Theory - more specifically, marginal utility and particularly, diminishing marginal utility - but such is beyond the scope of this brief explanation.
J. "|1120575581 -->
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
Guest_Jox_*
|
Jun 22 05, 04:01
|
Guest

|
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your re-visit.
>A>"Ocean lifeboat - -- Mid-ocean ? >J>Why, please?" >A>Well, there ain't really no other kind than ocean lifeboats, while the "mid" would tell us something re location, while still leaving the word ocean in.
I see now. I think, in a strange way, we're agreeing. I used "ocean" to denote location - so to me, "mid" is superfluous. I didn't use "ocean" to mean type of lifeboat - just location. I'll think on't - thank you.
>F>If pressed for sylls, "mid-sea lifeboat" ? Not sure.
Thanks - will be considering.
J.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Jox What price Diamonds? Jun 20 05, 03:55 Dear Jox,
"Oh? Why a paradox? Simply because usua... Jun 20 05, 04:38 Eisa Hi james
This is such a thought provoking poem wh... Jun 20 05, 04:51 Nina Hi James
Interesting poem comparing the economic ... Jun 20 05, 06:49 Nina Hi James, Alan
I hadn't a clue what diminishi... Jun 20 05, 08:56 Jox Hi all,
Thanks for the comments. Sorry I don... Jun 20 05, 09:56 Jox Hi Nina,
I'm impressed by your link - very ac... Jun 20 05, 10:15 Toumai Dear James,
What a fascinating introduction to th... Jun 20 05, 11:16 Nina Hi James
I'm impressed by your link - very ac... Jun 20 05, 11:33 Jox Hi Alan,
Thanks for your visit and work.
>A>If t... Jun 20 05, 14:14 Nina Hi James
I didn't know you were counting syll... Jun 20 05, 15:08 Jox Hi Nina - I keep answering your points out-of-sequ... Jun 20 05, 15:33 Dear Jox,
"Ocean lifeboat - ... Jun 20 05, 15:41 Nina Hi James
I'll confuse you even more now, sorr... Jun 20 05, 16:12 Jox Hi Nina,
Thanks for re-visiting.
Yes, you have c... Jun 20 05, 16:21 Nina Hi James
so why is "golden" wrong, then?
urmmmm p... Jun 20 05, 16:28 Jox Hi Eisa,
>E>This is such a thought provoking poem... Jun 22 05, 03:03 Jox Hi Fran,
Thanks for your visit and comments...
>... Jun 22 05, 03:20 Jox Hi Nina,
UNFINISHED - will continue ASAP
Thanks ... Jun 22 05, 04:19 Jox Hi all,
TC 0404 updated today (22/06/2005) - Vers... Jun 22 05, 08:44 JustDaniel Excellent, simple, straightforward, yet poetic pan... Jun 22 05, 08:55 Jox Hi Daniel,
Thanks for visiting and critting.
>D>... Jun 22 05, 09:22 Jox Hi Daniel 2,
I've tried a few things - includ... Jun 22 05, 10:19 Cybele Hi James,
Came to read the poems. Lo love the re... Jun 23 05, 07:21 Jox Hi Grace,
Thanks for popping in.
Very pleased yo... Jun 23 05, 07:47 Cleo_Serapis Congrats James on your wizard award winning tile! ... Jul 5 05, 09:58 Jox Hi Lori,
Missed this too - thank you very much,
... Jul 5 05, 11:18 Nina Hi James
many congratulations on getting a wizard... Jul 5 05, 11:24 Jox Hi Nina, thank you.
And my deep apologies about t... Jul 5 05, 11:33 Nina Hi J
ROFL :rofl:
Nina Jul 5 05, 11:36 Toumai Congratulations, James
The poem is excellent, ... Jul 5 05, 12:26 Jox Hi Nina :)
Hi Fran,
Thank you very much.
But we... Jul 5 05, 13:17
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
  |
Read our FLYERS - click below
Reference links provided to aid in fine-tuning
your writings. ENJOY!
|
|
|
|