Hi everyone,
I have been reading with great interest the comments on what type of critique various members would ideally like to receive, which gives valuable insight for all of us learning this process.
QUOTE
Critting work is almost as much of an art form as writing.
One important lesson I have learnt, is that a crit does not necessarily mean offering suggestions for improvement. What I enjoy most when critting work is when I can offer my own interpretations of what I have read. Sometimes I grasp the meaning and sometimes I do not, especially If the poem is very abstract.
Extract from NINA's comments.
As a 'newbie' to all of this I doubt very much if I can crit as any poet - or prose writer - would ideally like, and I often feel I should beg indulgence for my ineptitude as I stumble along the path of learning.
However, I also wonder if it is ever fair to say to a critter 'this is how I wish to be critted' as the critter is the one doing the work at this stage. If a piece of work is in an open crit forum it may be interpreted in many different ways, seen in many different lights.
So what if it is a form piece that will only be published in such a journal eventually - perhaps a new insight will arise from review by those more used to free verse. So what if it is a means to a message - a discussion of rhythm may improve it's flow.
With love to all - and appreciation for all the wonderful crits I have received here on MM - thank you.
Fran