Hi, Eisa,
thanks for stopping by, always appreciated. This wasn't meant to be deep, maybe I need to rework s.3 - the 'mea culpa' lines - to make this more accessible, more in my reply to Liz below. It is a personal piece though and Mary was a real friend once. Jim.
Hi Liz,
thanks for that very full cririque. I know that this will need a good overhaul eventually but not up to that at the moment, still a bit fragile with the subject. S.3 is the exception, I need to be clearer in that one because that's the heart of this piece. Perhaps there is a subconscious obfuscation of meaning there, certainly enough for you to doubt its relevance. The 'computer error' referenced is mine, spending too long at the screen playing games, hence the 'data clerk'. This is also the human error that put the seasons out of sync - I just lost touch with my neighbours and time flew past, lost forever - the sin of omission was mine. The 'tribunal' is Christine and the kids; their 'defence' is that I was ill and just wasn't able to walk the avenue the way I used to in years gone by. I used to be secretary of our local community council and found that going out chatting was a better way to keep on top of concerns than waiting for a letter of complaint - Mary was one of those who were always out in their garden when I passed and we talked often and became good friends. When her cortege stopped outside my gate I hadn't even known she was ill. That last goodbye should be seen as mine by the way, hadn't thought of the reading that she might be the valedictorian. Maybe with that additional information readers will be able to offer crits to help me show that sense of, if not guilt, certainly contributory negligence I'm trying to bring out in that strophe. On form, I've posted in FV because I didn't want to let 'mechanics' get in the way - there is no conscious effort to maintain structure, just a desire to express my feelings on this. Jim
|